About Me

Name:Joe
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Hugo's "Old School" Aspirations

There's nothing like beginning a new century with ambitions to turn to a failed economic ideology from the previous century. Hugo Chavez, whose first name appears to be an amalgamation of the words "huge" and "ego" is pledging to use his impending vast new powers to usher in a socialist worker's paradise:
During a live broadcast from a cattle ranch in Venezuela's central plains, Chavez inaugurated a series of centers where he said Venezuelans will study socialist ideals while undergoing job training.
As workers milked cows and showed Chavez how they produce cheese, the president asked them about their daily lives and warned against the evils of capitalism.
He urged all Venezuelans to embrace "the socialism that we are going to create." But Chavez denied that he was attempting to steer oil-rich Venezuela toward Cuba-style communism, as many critics allege.

Perhaps someone should ask Hugo the Magnificent why, if the socialist state he would like to create is so superior to capitalism, tens of thousands of Mexican immigrants are seeking entrance into the United States instead of getting in on the ground floor of the worker's utopia he aspires to create? Hugo's also trying to calm the upper class -- and probably also the middle class -- understandably nervous about his ambitions by telling what I certainly believe to be a pernicious lie:

President Hugo Chavez denied Sunday that his left-leaning government would seize private property - such as second homes or expensive cars - from the wealthy and called on Venezuelans not to fear his accelerated push toward socialism.

Then there's this howler:

Chavez has raised concerns by repeatedly saying he wants to continue governing Venezuela until 2021 or longer. He was re-elected to a second, six-year term in December - his last under Venezuela's Constitution. But Chavez has proposed a constitutional reform that would allow indefinite re-election.

Why even bother stating a date? Surely his ambition is to govern Venezuela until he dies, after which he will limit himself to one term in recognition of the challenge of facing such a workload at such an, ahem, advanced age. I fear that this guy won't be going anywhere for a long, long time.

This entry cross-posted at Hugo Chavez Watch.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Venezuelans Protest Chavez Impending Power Grab

According to this story, only "hundreds" of people have begun to publicly protest the impending action by the National Assembly to grant Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez dictatorial powers:

Hundreds of Venezuelans have protested in Caracas against a congressional measure that would grant Hugo Chavez, the country's president, unbridled powers to pass laws by decree.

The protest came as the pro-Chavez National Assembly said it would postpone granting final approval to allow him to enact laws by decree for an 18-month period.
 
Raising their hands in the air, some 400 to 500 protesters stood in a plaza and shouted in unison: "Faced with authoritarianism - more democracy."

Hopefully this number is underreported or just the start of mass protests.  It would be highly disturbing if tens of thousands don't take to the streets.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hugo the Optimist

Sure, and I suppose when Castro's dead, Chavez will proclaim that he's "almost breathing."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chavez Seeking To Consolidate State Power

Hugo Chavez is stepping up his efforts to consolidate his power by nationalizing major industries and removing constitutional impediments to his continued re-election:

Invoking Jesus Christ, Karl Marx and Fidel Castro, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has begun a new six-year term in office by pushing his anti-U.S., socialist revolution into a new era that critics say increasingly evokes Latin America's authoritarian governments of the past.

This month alone, Chavez has announced plans to nationalize Venezuela's electrical industry and its largest telecommunications company and has refused to renew the broadcast license of RCTV, the television station most critical of him.

He also has created a single leftist party under his leadership and tweaked the Bush administration by hosting Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

His allies who control the Venezuelan National Assembly are also on the cusp of abrogating their authority and ceding vast powers to Chavez:

The Chavez-dominated National Assembly is expected to approve by midweek a resolution giving him the power to rule by decree for 18 months. Chavez said he would use the authority to advance a host of "revolutionary laws" in areas ranging from the economy to defense, and he also is seeking to strip Venezuela's Central Bank of its autonomy.

Even the Venezuelan Catholic Church is getting nervous.  Based upon the history of the church in other socialist nations -- particularly Nazi Germany and the former Soviet Union -- they have good reason to be:

Most Venezuelans are Roman Catholic and the church wields tremendous influence among parishioners, giving particular sting to the barbs exchanged between Chavez and conservative priests as he begins a drive to remake Venezuela into a socialist state.

Some Catholic leaders are worried the socialist transformation could infringe on freedoms, and in the past week Monsignor Roberto Luckert, one of Chavez's most outspoken critics, said he believes Venezuela is headed for communism.

Chavez is very blunt about his designs to have the state confiscate the wealth and property of Venezuelans:

"Oh, you have a yacht? Perfect, give it to me, buddy," Chavez said. "You go around Caracas in a tremendous car. You have a house where you live and another one by sea . . . You have some marvelous art collections — come here, buddy."

The Chavez-dominated government is leading the people of Venezuela down a very dark and insidious path.  With all the history available regarding what happens to nations that traverse that path, it's remarkable that Chavez would be embracing it with such self-righteousness and gusto.  Obviously he is succumbing to that most despicable of human weaknesses in desiring to aggregate power to himself.  I can't help but think, however, that for all his hawking of "sophisticated" tomes like Noam Chomsky's Hegemony or Survival, the man is really nothing more than an uneducated rube.  His coarse public statements about American "gringos" and comparisons between President Bush and the devil at a venue like the United Nations only confirm such an assessment. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chavez and Ahmadinejad Seek "Anti-Imperialist" Front

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are forging closer ties in an effort to counterbalance what they view as U.S. imperialism:

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said they were ready to spend billions of dollars (euros) financing projects in other countries to help thwart US domination.

The anti-US Presidents whose efforts to extend their influence have alarmed Washington met Saturday in Venezuela’s capital, the first stop on Ahmadinejad’s tour of Latin America that will also see him visit newly elected leftist leaders in Nicaragua and Ecuador.

After Venezuela, Ahmadinejad will visit newly elected leftist governments in Nicaragua and Ecuador that are also seeking to reduce Washington’s influence in the region. Bolivian President Evo Morales, another critic of US policy, said he plans to meet with Ahmadinejad while both are in Ecuador Monday.

Ahmadinejad’s visit Saturday - his second to Venezuela in less than four months - comes as he seeks to break international isolation over his country’s nuclear program and possibly line up new allies in Latin America.

With Ahmadinejad trying to make inroads into the Western hemisphere, it may be time to assert the Monroe Doctrine.  While he may not be attempting to introduce a formal military force into the region, Iran's history of financing terrorist proxies should be enough to cause concern.  Of course, the Monroe doctrine as applied here would really involve the use of military force against Iran.  The last thing we need is for Iran to become involved in financing and training radical anti-American Latin American groups to venture across the porous U.S.-Mexican border and launch terrorist attacks.  This may be a reach, but I'm somewhat concerned.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Uzbekistan Round-Up

January 14

NGO's reportedly are under fire from the government.

Here's a post critical of the EU's ability to champion democracy, particularly in Uzbekistan.  I guess we in the United States aren't the only ones critical of the hapless and ineffective EU.

This post includes a small map showing parts of the world where the government blocks Internet access.  Uzbekistan is among them.

This post discusses the peculiar feature within the Uzbekistan Constitution that seems to leave the expiration of a president's term up in the air -- a nice feature for a dictator.  The same blog carries a post discussing a RAND analysis of U.S. security assistance to Uzbekistan.

This article levels significant criticism regarding how agriculture policy works in Uzbekistan, where farmers aren't really allowed to own land and make independent decisions.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Zimbabwe Round-Up

An EU-based Christian aid society is calling upon the EU to renew targeted sanctions against Zimbabwe:

The targeted sanctions are directed at Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe and other leaders in Zimbabwe who have led the country into economic and political chaos and are designed so as not to hurt Zimbabwe’s poor, Teafund said.

The sanctions prevent Mugabe and his associates from traveling to the EU, freeze any assets they hold in the EU and include an arms embargo. They were first imposed in 2002 when the Zimbabwe elections held that year were neither free nor fair, and because of human rights abuses being committed by the government of Zimbabwe. The EU has renewed these bans each year since.

A group of Zimbabweans demonstrated outside the White House on January 12 to raise awareness of the Mugabe regime and the destitution of the African nation:

The deteriorating situation in Zimbabwe visited the seat of America’s government Friday when more than 75 MDC activists and concerned Zimbabweans from different states demonstrated outside the White House. Some traveled from as far as Ohio which is 8 hours away from Washington DC to express their discontent.

Concerned Zimbabweans in the USA say 2007 is the year they will make a concerted and consistent advocacy to remove the Mugabe regime. “We are far away from home the best we can do is make sure we are supportive of the heroic struggle that the people of Zimbabwe are waging against this tyrannical regime,” Mlilo said.

Here's one blogger's assessment of what the future may hold for Zimbabwe.  It isn't encouraging:

When the revolt finally comes and the government breaks down completely, it will not simply be a popular revolution of the starving with (say) the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) at its head. It will be a battle between emerging war-lords, seeking to control the country’s mineral wealth.

An editorial in the Zimbabwe Independent argues that the pro-democracy political movements need to unify against President Mugabe's Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front Party (ZANU PF) to replace Mugabe of be in a position to vie for succession:

As we have said in the past, merely standing on pedestals and calling Mugabe a dictator is not enough to change Zanu PF's destructive policies. This is because there are thousands of others who make a living by propping up the establishment. Whether the MDC is up to the task of shifting the balance of political forces this year is still to be seen. That starts with the party putting its house in order and setting a convincing agenda rather than waiting for the succession crisis in Zanu PF to give it a boon.

Another blogger posts about the battle between Zimbabwean authorities and illegal miners seeking to obtain minerals and sell them in foreign markets:

The search for gold and diamonds has become an attractive option for thousands of Zimbabweans struggling to make ends meet in a tough economic environment.

But the cash-strapped authorities are desperate to harness the foreign currency that sales of precious minerals should rake in and have mounted a tough campaign to curb leakages. More than 19,000 people have been arrested since the start of a police blitz against illegal panners and dealers in November.
At a function to launch Tekere's book Tekere -- a Lifetime of Struggle, the two veterans of the struggle for Zimbabwe's liberation said Mugabe had to be persuaded to join the nationalist cause yet he now regarded himself as a "king" who had solely delivered the country from colonialism.

"We produced a creature that has destroyed this country," said Nkala, who said he was instrumental in convincing Mugabe to join the National Democratic Party, the precursor of Zanu and Zapu.

A column in the Zimbabwe Independent is highly critical of Mugabe's economic reforms, in particular land reform:

Until the president, his ministers and the entire governmental hierarchy are prepared to recognise facts, admit to them, and effectively address them, Zimbabwe's economy will continue to decline, the pronounced widespread poverty and misery will become evermore intense and economic recovery will become increasingly distant.

At the outset of his address, the president yet again claimed: "The underperformance of the economy we are now turning around is largely a product of the illegal overt and covert sanctions imposed on us by Britain and her allies, for daring to reclaim our land."

The labor problems of Zimbabwe are discussed in this post.

The government is also in the process of hiring lawyers to defend the land reform policy before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ISID) against dispossessed Dutch farmers.

If the Dutch farmers win the case, it could open the floodgates for similar claims in international courts by white farmers of different nationalities whose businesses were protected under Bippa agreements but were still expropriated without compensation. Bippas are Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreements.

Here is a report about Pakistan aiding Mugabe's army:

Pakistan has sent several senior military experts to help strengthen President Robert Mugabe’s army, which has been severely weakened by mass resignations, desertions and a Western military embargo, says a report in The Independent.

The secondment of the Pakistanis to retrain and re-equip the Zimbabwean army comes as Mr Mugabe is desperate to beef up his forces as he fears the deteriorating economy may lead to social unrest, the report says.

NewZimbabwe.com has an opinion piece discussing the racial tactics of Mugabe's ZANU PF:

What is more troubling about the ruling elite’s desires for political uniformity among citizens is that they have racialized democratic discourse by reducing political competitors to stooges for white interests. All those who question the ruling elite’s administration have to be white and if they are black they have white handlers, strategists and backers. According to this thinking the Movement for Democratic Change, civil society and the privately owned media are nothing but fronts and purveyors of white interests.

Hmmmm, where have I seen this tactic before?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reinvigorating Dictator Watch

Alright, so it's been awhile since I've posted on this blog.  I can assure you I haven't fallen victim to laziness.  To the contrary, I have been spending quite a bit of time invested in my Scottish Right blog.  I would greatly appreciate if you'd check it out now and again! 

In any event, I've decided that there's really no good reason why I can't make a concerted effort to run both Scottish Right and Dictator Watch.  Scottish Right is more of a "catch-all" blog in that I post on politics and current news in a general sense.  In doing so, I am competing with a multitude of really great blogs out there and am in a state of constant appreciation for my growing readership.  The reason I established Dictator Watch was to provide a more refined, one-stop shopping venue for those interested in keeping tabs on some of the world's worst people.  No, I'm not talking about Rosie and Donald.  This is serious stuff!  I'm referring to the dictators, tyrants and oligarchs who still hold billions of people under their boots.

Living in the West, I believe we often take for granted the freedoms we have.  If we were to spend just a few weeks trying to survive in a place like Swaziland, Burma, China or Cuba, we would be in for a truly jarring experience.   A disturbingly large number of people throughout the world live in a permanent condition of tyranny and squalor.  This blog will attempt to tell their story by linking to news reports and with the occasional exposition and commentary by yours truly.

With that, I hope to become a more active participant in the terrific project that is Townhall! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Assad Can't Be Trusted

Ed Morrissey is rightly skeptical regarding Syrian leader Bashar Assad's committment to prevent arms from getting to Hezbollah.

It would be a lovely development if it were true. However, one has to be incredibly naive to think that Syria would give up its proxy in Lebanon just because Annan asked them to do so. For one thing, Assad needs Hezbollah's influence in Lebanon not just to keep Israelis on the defensive but to keep the government of Beirut hostage to Syrian demands. Hezbollah's status as the only civil-war militia still bearing arms is no accident.

Kofi Annan is either naively idealistic or he just isn't that concerned about Israel's security.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shocker -- Iran Defies International Community On Uranium Enrichment

The sun rises, the sun sets, another rogue regime refuses to cooperate with the international community and sanctions appear unlikely because two of the Security Council members are likely to exercise their vetoes.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad urged European members of the council against resorting to sanctions, saying punishment would not dissuade his country from pursuing its disputed nuclear program.

Iran could theoretically still announce a full stop to enrichment before the deadline set by the Security Council. But that appeared unlikely, considering Tehran's past refusal to consider such a move and findings by the International Atomic Energy Agency that it was enriching small quantities of uranium as late as Tuesday.

Iran could "theoretically" convert to Christianity and open a museum honoring the victims of the Holocaust but somehow I doubt either will happen.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ahmadinejad -- Blogger To Debator?

What is it with the heads of tyrannical regimes and debates?  Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has challenged President Bush to a televised debate to discuss world affairs.  This is oddly reminiscent of a similar challenge posed by deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein during the run-up to the Iraq War.   Ahmadinejad had better be careful in mimicking the dynamics of the Iraqi confrontation because that one sure didn't end well for Saddam. 

Here's a screamer:

"The debate should be go uncensored in order for the American people to be able to listen to what we say and they should not restrict the American people from hearing the truth."

Riiiiiight.  So the head of a tyrannical regime is condemning censorship.  Isn't this the same regime that engages in rampant censorship of opinions contrary to those endorsed by the mullahs?  I have a counter-offer for President Ahmadinejad.  Instead of debating President Bush, why doesn't he have a globally televised debate on neutral ground with an Iranian dissident about regime "affairs."  Of course, the dissident's entire family should be allowed to leave the country prior to the debate.  We need to keep things fair, after all.

Obviously, as with Saddam, Ahmadinejad's call for a debate is just a rank little political stunt.  Even so, perhaps C-Span might see an opportunity to launch a new series called "Debates With Dictators."  I can see it now:  "And this concludes the debate between U.S. President George W. Bush and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.  Join us next week as President Bush debates global affairs, hemispheric politics and the issue of U.S. hegemony with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.  I'm Mike Wallace.  See you next week."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iran Tests Missile While UN Telegraphs Inaction

Iran has test-fired a sub-to-surface missile during military exercises in the Persian Gulf.  Meanwhile, the dithering has begun among members of the UN Security Council with Russia opposing the imposition of sanctions and France opposing the use of force.  I suppose the only viable option remains calling in the knights who say "ni."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iran Moves Another Step Closer To Obtaining A Nuclear Weapon

Iran just gave the international community the finger

An Iranian plant that produces heavy water officially went into operation on Saturday, despite U.N. demands that Tehran stop the activity because it can be used to develop a nuclear bomb.

Reactors fueled by enriched uranium use regular - or "light" - water as a "moderator" in the chain reaction that produces energy. Reactors using "heavy water" contain a heavier hydrogen particle, which allows the reactor to run on natural uranium mined by Iran, foregoing the enrichment progress.

But the spent fuel from a heavy water reactor can be reprocessed to extract plutonium for use in a bomb.

This gives the regime a way around the uranium enrichment process and therefore makes international demands to stop trying to enrich uranium moot.  I would hazard a guess that this was the announcement originally scheduled for August 22 but was delayed for technical reasons.  The regime still needs to construct a heavy water reactor for plutonium extraction.  The reactor is reportedly scheduled to go on-line in 2009.

The gauntlet has been thrown down before the UN Security Council.   I'm not optimistic that the Council will move beyond dithering and more "final" chances.  The United States or Israel may need to step up and impede Iran's progress.  It appears that the heavy water plant would make for an ideal, fat target considering that it was built right out in the open unlike other components of the regime's nuclear program that are either scattered around the country or protected within deep bunkers.  A military strike would receive international condemnation in public, but would likely be supported in private.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chavez Compares Israel To Hitler

Hugo Chavez has just publicly revealed that he inhabits some kind of Seinfeldian bizzarro world.

"Israel often criticizes Hitler ... but they have done the same thing, perhaps even worse," Chavez told reporters Friday in a briefing during his six-day visit to China.

Denouncing the "fascist attitudes" of Israel, he said: "What has happened was a genocide. They must be brought in front of an international tribunal."

This guy will be posting on Daily Kos soon.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Expect Endless Talk And No Action On Iran

When is the international community going to move from being "concerned" and take action on Iran?  We are rapidly approaching the August 31 deadline after which the United Nations is supposed to take up the issue of sanctions if, as expected, the Iranian regime doesn't cease and desist from it's uranium enrichment program.  I completely agree with Regime Change Iran on the likely outcome for any sanctions following the Iranian expression of interest in further negotiations:
This very temptation has worked wonders for the Iranians. Holding out the possibility of negotiations effectively neutralizes the Europeans, who love the idea of dialogue and engagement and hope that it will lead to solving the problem peacefully and reasonably, and it also makes it difficult for Russia and China to go along with sanctions in the United Nations Security Council, because they will argue that the diplomatic channel was not exhausted.

This is exactly why the American Left cannot be trusted with our national security.  The Left never met a conflict they didn't want to solve with layer upon layer of diplomacy.  There is nothing inherently wrong with diplomacy as a concept, but it can only be effective if it includes both carrots and sticks.  The problem is that while the international community largely agrees on the carrots it can rarely, if ever, reach unity on the sticks.  The French, Russians and Chinese in particular are loathe to impose sanctions when it might effect their own financial interests and all it takes is for just one of these powers to exercise a veto on the United Nations Security Council to prevent sanctions.  These nations are just looking for excuses to avoid or delay sanctions.  Rogue regimes know this and exploit the hesitancy with calculated ruthlessness.  The entire UN system is not designed appropriately to impose any meaningful penalties on malcontent regimes.  

What the Left completely fails to comprehend is that the U.N. Security Council "diplomatic" process is actually an impetus to military action outside of the U.N. model.  There may have been no need for the "coalition of the willing" in Iraq if the United Nations had acted swiftly and forthrightly in convincing Saddam to change his behavior.  Right up to the liberation, Saddam was convinced that Russia or France would prevent any serious consequences from befalling him.  If Saddam had been told by his allies early on during the "diplomatic" process that he had better come clean or else, he would not have been under the illusion that he could cheat fate again.  

The current diplomatic process so beloved by liberals is corrupt to its core.  Diplomacy is a good and noble thing.  A diplomatic process enveloped in the tentacles of corruption and graft is doomed to empower our enemies. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »